Il y a deux ans, j’ai eu le plaisir de participer à un colloque du ZiF, à Bielefeld, organisé par Martin Carrier, après avoir présenté mes travaux la veille dans un autre séminaire. Le colloque portait sur la recherche suspecte et, comme toujours dans ce centre, a donné lieu à de longues et instructives discussions. Lors de la séance de discussion finale, nous avons échangé en détail sur la question des intentions, qui revient souvent dans ces débats, mais n’est pas toujours traitée avec les ressources nécessaires, en particulier celles de la philosophie de l’action, et l’article que je viens juste de publier dans les International Studies in the Philosophy of Science en est sorti.

Le programme

Quelques photos

Abstract

The paper seeks to contribute to clarifying agnotology as an ‘epistemic strategy’, conceived as ‘epistemically damaging and hurt[ing] the production of knowledge’. My general claim is that the grammar of intentions ‘embedded’ in agnotological arguments is often not considered accurately. I use considerations from the philosophy of action as a theoretical framework to make more explicit what is implied in agnogenetic manoeuvres. Agnotology, as a ‘theory’ about epistemic states, in particular knowledge and ignorance, would be seriously incomplete without that component. The following can thus be read as a contribution to an analysis of the presuppositions of the strategic variant of Agnotology. My first claim is that the more common objections to the introduction of intentions are in no way definitive. My second, more specific, claim is that we need a room, in our conceptual toolbox, for ‘anti-epistemic intentions’, which play a key role in agnotological arguments.

Mathias Girel (2023) What Exactly is Presupposed by Agnotology? The Challenge of Intentions, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, DOI: 10.1080/02698595.2023.2257111